sk1 (Alomone Labs)
Structured Review

Sk1, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sk1/pmc13017914-81-6-8?v=Alomone+Labs
Average 94 stars, based on 16 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Compensatory attenuation of cortical apoptosis by SK2 downregulation following ketamine anesthesia"
Article Title: Compensatory attenuation of cortical apoptosis by SK2 downregulation following ketamine anesthesia
Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1761187
Figure Legend Snippet: Apamin-sensitive SK2 channel-mediated mAHP currents may be linked to changes in neuronal spike frequency and adaptation at 24 h post-ketamine anesthesia. (A,B) Representative traces (A) and amplitudes (B) of the mAHP currents, treatment conditions as indicated. S1 slices from control (Ctrl) and ketamine-treated (Ket) rats were separately incubated and perfused with apamin (100 nM) or its vehicle. 22–25 neurons from 7–10 rats were used per condition. (C) Plots of spike frequency vs. current injected for layer II/III pyramidal neurons of S1. The significant differences in the spike frequency between the Ctrl and Ket groups (Ctrl: Vehicle vs. Ket: Vehicle, 80 pA, 100 pA and 110 pA, P < 0.01; 90 pA, P < 0.001) were eliminated after apamin treatment (Ctrl: Apamin vs. Ket: Apamin, P > 0.05). 20–22 neurons from 7–9 rats were recorded per condition. (D,E) Spikes in S1 layer II/III pyramidal neurons evoked for 3 s, 80 pA current injection (D) , and the adaptation index (E) was obtained by the algorithm mentioned above. 18–20 neurons from 7–9 rats were recorded per condition. (F) Quantitative analysis of SK1-3 mRNA in S1 of P8 rats. 5 rats were used per condition. P > 0.05. (G,H) Immunoblots and quantitative analysis of total (G) and membrane-bound (H) SK1-3 levels in S1 of ketamine-treated rats, normalized to corresponding levels in control rats. 8–12 rats were used per condition. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; n.s ., not significant. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for (F,H) and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests for the other panels. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Control, Incubation, Injection, Western Blot, Membrane, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test
